美国权威杂志《财富》(《Fortune》)于1995年一度预言,回归将令香港死亡。但回归十年后,最新出版的《时代》周刊,终在十三年后为此言论来了个迟来的大平反,不仅承认其姊妹杂志《财富》当年报道错误,更直认香港比从前更有活力。5 D$ c# I( j$ ]' e
5 {* Y6 d2 W2 W( y& ] & p. n4 V( d& u( p# i, Y, Y5 U# R$ ]0 p8 b5 ?7 |, e
" @$ U; ~. ~% p+ Q" [
最新出版的《时代》周刊,以25页的篇幅探讨回归十年香港的变化,并以“阳光灿烂中见阴霾(Sunshine with Clouds)”为点题。对于《财富》杂志当年惊世的《香港之死》报道,《时代》坦诚认错,承认姊妹杂志完全是“错误地”及“差劣地”作出推测。《时代》解释香港过去十年经历金融风暴、禽流感、SARS、市民为基本法廿三条上街示威等……当世人以为香港贵为福地的气数已尽,香港却一一熬过来。( V9 z' ?+ x4 G2 v7 A' y2 O
0 p2 n% S4 E" W+ ~
离回归十周年尚余三个星期,《时代》指出香港近期的股市屡创新高,物业格价亦稳步上扬,正值阳光灿烂时,不过晴空之中却有阴霾:香港前景仍受许多不明朗因素影响。0 b; I4 }) i* N7 K Q' c
) i2 p: H+ ~ J& T1 K T7 p/ P 6 r* H0 M" s/ x9 yJuly 1, 1997: After 156 years of British rule, China resumes sovereignty over Hong Kong. % L9 o5 E0 _# j9 A4 T5 B5 q6 H# _! i/ p; V1 M7 I ! E1 ^3 J6 }% \' w# i" ?0 A8 c$ L( D) \Feb. 19, 2002: Chief Executive Tung Chee-hwa, appointed by Beijing in 1997 to serve as Hong Kong's first post-colonial leader, is reelected. 1 h& |' X \5 U- v4 F+ V. } ' _# I2 Y& \: w: h7 J. |9 X3 _, \9 D# O 5 c& X6 [( E X/ V: f1 I March 10, 2005: After weeks of rumors, Chief Executive Tung Chee-hwa abruptly resigns, citing his declining health. ( _4 ?0 n/ J4 o( v: D9 T
. W, q5 L5 m w' H 1 Y0 n9 m0 P* @/ |, |* PThe Expat Exodus ' P; f" Y: `+ x" E {) E2 ]* }
On July 1, 1997, as Hong Kong waved goodbye to its colonial rulers on board the HMS Britannia, pessimists predicted the city's expatriate professionals would follow. ( n( C6 ]7 d" E( U0 L3 P( w
D+ d3 U& L8 c, f' \( N : Z# x6 `4 B( x( }( t . r* x# d+ e+ `' ` Emigration 5 ]' U% B7 f& A, O* T7 ?Jittery about political crackdowns and economic slowdown, thousands of Hong Kong residents left town in the years before the handover. & @, p2 F5 O0 P7 n 0 W6 o! f( n0 ~* g) `+ J& W
7 e; I# @- |# t6 A6 x* f The People's Liberation Army c4 {5 E. z5 P/ r. p4 b @
A 1995 Fortune magazine article famously predicted the "Death of Hong Kong" following the handover, prophesying that PLA soldiers would be a visible, ominous presence on Hong Kong's streets. : [3 [' @, p+ O9 s9 L# U. X" Z2 J( D) \, O& M1 ?
% D o1 Z$ S1 [" k3 ^0 I* L' [' J2 ]" |; v) g7 n5 `% y
Victoria Park. Queen's Pier. Stanley. While many symbols of British rule vanished overnight after the handover — teams of workmen removed the royal seal from post offices, police stations and institutions like the Royal Hong Kong Jockey Club — Hong Kong's colonial place names endure. l& t0 o: v( o$ y" u
4 | O8 {) k( v+ f9 \. N. d
% O! f( ~) W. A1 p8 F7 p' q* N$ r w# S ) P# f/ [8 l8 G5 K* x) ]Milton Friedman, the late Nobel Prize-winning economist, predicted that within two years of the handover China would introduce capital controls and replace the territory's currency. Wrong. + n& \. ?7 _8 }/ r* S
: O+ s) }8 \; M- X; q+ ?$ i! _; ^# J9 T. j - G! E' m: f% `& `5 o" p
With its black robes and horsehair wigs, Hong Kong's court system is an obvious inheritance from Britain. Little has changed since the handover. 7 q! ^. E/ H- L; m' Q ' [0 r3 R# O: o, j7 Q7 C6 V ' q& u+ L ^/ x3 [. U8 BHong Kong made itself fabulously wealthy by acting as the lone conduit between China and the world, funneling goods and investment in both directions. , N+ A% L" M+ ?, F+ ]! k+ x+ v- A% I, \" R, d V* Y3 c
/ A7 P/ e7 d0 f7 H: F' o 8 {; U1 t% X4 w/ _3 \# NContrary to dire predictions, Hong Kong hasn't yet lost its economic edge to cheaper cities on the mainland or to cleaner, more orderly Singapore.