- 积分
- 4287
- 威望
- 11
- 金钱
- 2132
- 阅读权限
- 5
- 来自
- New Zealand
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
|
120#
发表于 2025-1-4 08:48
| 只看该作者
ahot It s desperate
Sgwm The Observer view on Geert Wilders win: far-right victory is a warning to the rest of Europe
More than 1,500 breast cancer patients in UK face long waits to have reconstructive surgery after hospitals could not operate on them during the pandemic because they were tackling Covid-19.The women are facing delays of many months, possibly years because the NHS has such a big backlog of cases to get through, according to research by the charity Breast Cancer Now.When the lockdown began in March the NHS st stanley cupe opped performing breast reconstructions for women seeking one after a mastectomy as part of its wider suspension of care. That was because so many operating theatres were being used as overflow intensive care units and because doctors and hospital bosses feared that patients coming into hospital might catch Covid.The NHS started doing them again in July, but not everywhere and not in the same numbers as before. Inspect your bits n bobbins : Tracey Crouc stanley tumbler h on why going public on her cancer was importantRead moreWomen already faced delays in accessing reconstructive surgery in many parts of the UK before the pandemic struck, and there is concern that those who want to have the operation will have to wait until hospitals can again routinely offer the service, which may not be until 2021 or later. We are deeply concerned by our finding that over 1,500 breast cancer patients may now face lengthy and extremely upsetting delays for r stanley becher econstructive surgery, said Delyth Morgan, the chief executive of Breast Cancer Now. This will leave many women who want to have reconstruction w Zdgv It s no use shouting back to work when Britain s industries are in a jobs meltdown
I have reluctantly decided that I did change my mind during the past decade, on whether or not Britain should have a Human Rights Act. For years I was sure that when I deci stanley tazza ded to celebrate the act after years of having opposed the very idea of it, I was 鈥?despite appearances 鈥?being totally consistent.The act we have, I used to argue, was not the one that they liberals, lawyers, New Labour, Lord Lester etc 鈥?my opponents had wanted, but was one that inste stanley usa ad much better reflected our side s goals the socialists, the democrats, Old Labour . After all, I pointed out, the UK Human Rights Act preserves legislative sovereignt stanley cup y, empowers public authorities to ignore human rights when parliament tells them to and denies the judges power to strike down law. This was human rights so lite as to be a victory for the sceptics rather than the enthusiasts. Human rights that existed in name only could be supported even by those hostile to the idea.All very clever for sure 鈥?to be in favour of a law because it is not what it claims to be. If this was my true position, I would now be relaxed about the repeal proposed by the still most likely next government, David Cameron s Tories. But I am not 鈥?instead I am anxious. The Human Rights Act has done some very good work, a fair bit that is neutral and hardly anything at all that is downright destructive. The terrorism laws have been sharply modified. Asylum provision has been strengthened. The inquest system has been transformed for the better |
|
