灌水：一种「绝对无法返还的礼物」

bovon

射精 很爽, 问题:男人对女人射精后精液属于谁?

来自新闻部

post by
bauerns

bovon

口交窃精产子 判无罪 美判决指精液属送给对方拥有绝对产权礼物 不构成诈欺

　美国伊利诺州一名女子利用她与男友口交后所得的男友精液怀孕生子，结果被男友控告诈欺和窃盗，伊利诺州上诉法院24日做出重要判决，指男子在敦伦过程中送出的精液，属于送给对方的一种「绝对无法返还的礼物」，女方事后若利用这些精液进行人工怀孕并生子，不构成诈欺或窃盗罪名。

　这起发生在两名男女医师之间的奇特案件必须追溯到6年前，原告菲利普斯和被告艾恩丝两人曾有过肉体接触。两年后，菲利普斯突遭艾恩丝提起一名小孩的确认生父之诉，随后的DNA检验，证实他确为孩子的生父，必须支付每月800美元的养育费。菲利普斯认为自己被女方「设计」，向法院提出诈欺、窃盗及连带的民事赔偿告诉。

　菲利普斯向法院指称，对方有计画地利用两人某次口交机会欺骗并窃得他的精液来怀孕生子。事发后他身陷梦魇之苦，且因过度烦恼和精神压力，导致长时间饮食及睡眠失调，为此他决控告对方。艾恩丝则以她的行为不算过度极端、对方所称的精神痛苦还不到需要赔偿的程度作为抗辩。

bovon

上诉法院认定，男人送出的精液属收受者「拥有绝对产权」的礼物，支持下级法院所作艾恩丝胜诉的判决。唯判决指出，若原告所说艾恩丝利用口交取得精液来怀孕属实，的确可能对菲利普斯造成精神伤害，因而裁定将精神伤害的民事官司发回原审法院重审。

　菲利普斯在上诉法院做出判决后，尚未对外发表意见，艾恩丝的律师则从亲情角度对精神伤害官司发回重审表示不满。他说：「孩子现已5岁，孩子若得知自己出生令父亲痛苦，叫他情何以堪！」

bovon

http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/02/24/sperm.theft.ap/index.html
Court: Man can sue for distress over surprise pregnancy
But sperm were hers to keep, court rules
Thursday, February 24, 2005 Posted: 1:08 PM EST (1808 GMT)

CHICAGO, Illinois (AP) -- An appeals court said a man can press a claim for emotional distress after learning a former lover had used his sperm to have a baby. But he can\\\'t claim theft, the ruling said, because the sperm were hers to keep.

The ruling Wednesday by the Illinois Appellate Court sends Dr. Richard O. Phillips\\\' distress case back to trial court.

Phillips accuses Dr. Sharon Irons of a \\\"calculated, profound personal betrayal\\\" after their affair six years ago, saying she secretly kept semen after they had oral sex, then used it to get pregnant.

He said he didn\\\'t find out about the child for nearly two years, when Irons filed a paternity lawsuit. DNA tests confirmed Phillips was the father, the court papers state.

Phillips was ordered to pay about $800 a month in child support, said Irons\\\' attorney, Enrico Mirabelli.

Phillips sued Irons, claiming he has had trouble sleeping and eating and has been haunted by \\\"feelings of being trapped in a nightmare,\\\" court papers state.

Irons responded that her alleged actions weren\\\'t \\\"truly extreme and outrageous\\\" and that Phillips\\\' pain wasn\\\'t bad enough to merit a lawsuit. The circuit court agreed and dismissed Phillips\\\' lawsuit in 2003.

But the higher court ruled that, if Phillips\\\' story is true, Irons \\\"deceitfully engaged in sexual acts, which no reasonable person would expect could result in pregnancy, to use plaintiff\\\'s sperm in an unorthodox, unanticipated manner yielding extreme consequences.\\\"

The judges backed the lower court decision to dismiss the fraud and theft claims, agreeing with Irons that she didn\\\'t steal the sperm.

\\\"She asserts that when plaintiff \\\'delivered\\\' his sperm, it was a gift -- an absolute and irrevocable transfer of title to property from a donor to a donee,\\\" the decision said. \\\"There was no agreement that the original deposit would be returned upon request.\\\"

Phillips is representing himself in the case. He could not be reached for comment Thursday.

\\\"There\\\'s a 5-year-old child here,\\\" Mirabelli said. \\\"Imagine how a child feels when your father says he feels emotionally damaged by your birth.\\\"

blackskin

没有耕坏的地，只有耕死的牛；田越耕越熟，牛越耕越老

男得真惨啊！！！！！！！！

bovon

「没几个男人会在嘿咻后，还跟女方要回自己的分泌物吧」男人在「射」了之后，和那坨「分泌物」的关系，就有如民法观念中的「抛弃占有」，基于「无主物先占」的原则，女方拿走当战利品也不犯法，除非男的表态要拿回去。「不过这种事很难开口耶」。法官驳回男方的指控，因为这是女方的「劳务所得」。

晒月亮的拖鞋

这个问题最好还是征求下当事者的意见